Skip to main content

For the Love of Christ

Thanks to Cindy Hadden for priming the pump on this. facebook.com/artistcindy

From the beginning — gays have been pushed to the outside of the gates in every culture (with the exception of a few). They WERE very well KNOWN in Jesus's day. In fact, it may be entirely possible that the Centurion who came to Jesus, asking him to "heal" his "servant" at "home" may have been the soldier's "partner."

Homosexuality was widespread in the Roman army; in fact, soldiers away from wives and homes for long periods of time used their servants to relieve themselves sexually. And yet — Jesus treated them equally, and DID NOT single them out as an example of sin, nor did he do that to prostitutes and women of ill repute. There is also speculation that the convert Paul (who is credited with writing three of the six clobber verses in the Bible that are used to justify anti-gay theology) was very "in tune" with gay culture of his time, maybe he too had experienced "partners" — and that his own homophobia troubled him enough to write something. But that something was NOT from Jesus. Paul's writings came a minimum of 50 years after Christ.

By comparison, Jesus never said anything prohibiting intimate, committed and loving relationships between two persons of the same sex and he never said anything about homosexuality. Rather, he alluded to a much more encompassing definition of marriage when he talked about eunuchs in the context of divorce and marriage (Matt: 19:11-12). He prefaced his comments by stating that not everyone would be able to accept his comments. This was a teaching device instead of an exclusionary proclamation. It was as if he was inviting his disciples to wrap their brains around what he was about to say (and not say). In that context, he was stating that marriage was to be taken seriously, because God took it seriously too. Therefore, divorce was not to be taken casually. When he interjects eunuchs into the discussion, he includes persons with a different sexuality into the equation. Significantly, he did not set up any delineations as to who a eunuch might be allowed to marry. IF that is the case, then a eunuch was free to marry.

The question then is, who should a eunuch marry, a man or a woman? Intersexed persons, those who according to Jesus are born eunuchs from their mother's womb, are not always 50/50 male and female. They could be more male than female, or more female than male—the possibilities are endless. Consequently, there is the possibility that what may appear as two men, though one is a eunuch, have every right to make a lifetime commitment to each other. Jesus uttered no prohibitions, did not define the allowable "pairings," nor did he say that eunuchs would be condemned or go to hell if they married. Jesus' point is that marriage is all about fidelity and commitment between two persons. He was not hung up about sexuality, why then are Christians so preoccupied with what is between our legs?

How does this relate to sexual orientation and attraction to the same sex? Doctors and the parents of an intersex child have a difficult time deciding how to best raise that child. They will often make a decision one way or another, to raise a girl or a boy. The deciding factor might simply be a cultural preference or what the parents feel they want in terms of gender. Unfortunately, studies show that in fifty percent of the cases, as that child gets older and becomes more sexually self aware, the sex chosen for the child is at odds with the child’s gender identity. If this is the case for a person born with “ambiguous” genitalia, that their gender identity is not directly related to their biological sexual characteristics, then who has the right to draw any lines of delineation as to which gender and sex pairings are correct?

Jesus invited ALL to the table — he meant ALL. He pointed out to love God first (God is love), and others AS YOU LOVE YOURSELF (or LOVE the gift of life given to you, no matter what your particular human characteristics. Being gay is NO choice, Being heterosexual is no choice. We do not wake up one day and make those inclinations and decisions. We may "act" on either for numerous reasons, but we do not choose.

As the American Psychological and Psychiatric Associations have told us for 40 years – "Being gay is simply another(complex) human characteristic, such as being left handed or the fact that eyes have ANY color at all, no genes known yet for those either.

As Christians and as a civil society, we must stop allowing the unknown history, the mis-information/untruth of previous long standing "self interpretations" and the "Corporate Religious views" (often made for more dubious reasons; i.e. to support slavery in past, women as second class citizens, women and children as property of men, and a long list) to prevent us from doing God's will and the progressive work of understanding God/Love more each day.

Popular posts from this blog

Behind the scenes of "Ask a transgender Christian"

A young woman I greatly admire is Rachel Held Evans. She is an amazing author, blogger, speaker, wife, mother and a seriously articulate Evangelical Christian who is not afraid to enter into conversations that would make many others run and hide in their little dogma houses.

Earlier in September of 2012, Rachel contacted me to see if I would be willing to be interviewed as part of her popular blog series titled "AKS A…" Would I be willing to be the target for "Ask a Transgender Christian?"My new friend Justin Lee, executive director of the Gay Christian Network (GCN) and author of the soon to be released book"Torn: Rescuing the Gospel from the Gays-vs.-Christians Debate" suggested me as the person to ask. (In the same way, Justin is the person Rachel chose for the "Ask a Gay Christian" interview.

Having followed Rachel for several months, my initial reaction to her email was one of disbelief and trepidation, given the level of intellectual and t…

Cats and dogs seem to matter more to the ruling BC Liberals than trans persons.

The Apparent Hypocrisy of British Columbia’s Elected Liberal Government
The same week that Transgender advocates and allies stood in front of the BC Legislature in support of the introduction of a private member’s bill aimed at protecting the rights of transgender people, the BC Liberal Government announced an order-in-council that adopts the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association’s Codes of Practice for both kennel and cat breeding.

Indeed, this is very good news for dogs and cats in British Columbia.
Yet, this same Government has sat intentionally on it’s laurels, refusing to pass an exact version of the “trans rights bill” on three previous occasions. This is the fourth time the Honourable Spencer Chandra Herbert, MLA for Vancouver-West End, introduces this bill. The bill would amend the BC Human Rights Code (BCHRC) to include “gender identity and gender expression.”
Having “gender identity and gender expression” included in the BCHRC will afford increased protection, safety, and …

Witnessing a Birth of Sorts

When the moment to start life anew comes, it usually happens in the quietness of one's spirit. Yesterday, February 21, 2012 will mark the moment my friend Tori took that step in the most unassuming way.

In 1999, about the time I was being assessed and diagnosed at the Vancouver Hospital's Gender Clinic, I made a couple of calls to a support group in the area. Their brochure listed a phone number and stated calls could be made on Thursday nights if you needed to speak to someone, otherwise you could leave a message and someone would get back to you. The woman who answered was friendly and explained the purpose of the group an how one would go about attending their meetings and other events. Membership was reserved for those who had been vetted and approved by the membership committee. Confidentiality and security of personal information was very high on the group's priority list.

Given the group's stated purposed was to provide a safe place for heterosexual men to cross…